Latest News‎ > ‎Education Section‎ > ‎


Does value investing work in India?

posted Nov 25, 2019, 11:56 PM by Harshul Vohra

It does, and it improves investor’s odds of getting higher returns.
The distribution of five-year returns over the long period shows that value-style investing improved the investor’s odds of making a high return.
The MSCI India Value Index, on an average, earned a five-year return (CAGR) of 14.9 per cent over the last 19-year period, while investors in the MSCI India Growth Index averaged 12.9 per cent.
Broadly, the calendaryear returns suggest that value style investing contains losses better than growth in big bear markets. It also delivers bigger gains in the initial legs of a new bull market. But when a bull market takes wing and establishes itself, growth stocks overtake their value counterparts.

To read full business line article click here:…/article3006092…/amp/…

Survivorship Bias Free Returns

posted Nov 19, 2019, 11:59 PM by Harshul Vohra   [ updated Nov 20, 2019, 12:12 AM ]

The mutual fund industry’s trade body, AMFI, reports all fund performance data after deleting the results of the funds which have been shut down. Since nearly 20% of Indian large cap mutual fund schemes have been wound up over the past five years, excluding these dead schemes obviously improve the industry’s performance (on the reasonable presumption that the funds which have been shut down were the worst performing funds)

When the average returns of mutual funds are calculated, they are of funds that exist over the entire period of study. That is, it is a return of the survivors. What about funds that are closed or merged during the period? How does that affect average returns? Since it is impossible to know at the start of the period which schemes would survive and which won’t, it is important to take into account the returns of all the schemes that were there at the start of the period and then arrive at average returns. This is called survivorship bias free returns.

Reporting the fund performance of the industry, SPIVA Scorecards account for the entire opportunity set—not just the survivors—thereby eliminating survivorship bias.

In the last 3 years, over 90% of the indian equity mutual funds have underperformed their respective benchmarks making a strong case for investing in low cost ETFs for the long term.

Know more:

Value Stocks vs Growth Stocks: Which Are Better?

posted Nov 15, 2019, 3:29 AM by Harshul Vohra

Image may contain: text

Value Stocks vs Growth Stocks: Which Are Better?

Growth stocks are considered stocks that have the potential to outperform the overall market over time because of their future potential, while value stocks are classified as stocks that are currently trading below what they are really worth and will, therefore, provide a superior return. Which category is better? The comparative historical performance of these two sub-sectors yields some surprising results.
Read more:

1-3 of 3